|
Campbell Newman should win the election with a vote of 60%
or better. While residents are evenly split on whether the city is heading in
the right direction, the Labor councilors get most of the blame for the
problems. Newman is winning because he is seen to be trying to get on with the
job “in difficult circumstances”. Voters want to give him a fair-go, and he has
every chance of taking seats from the ALP who are seen as obstructive,
particularly if voters continue to think of the contest as being of the Newman
team against Labor candidate Greg Rowell.
Newman is winning the votes of around 15% of normal Labor
voters, and winning around 70% of voters who don’t traditionally vote for any
particular party, making his vote twice his party’s traditional vote and very
much a personal achievement.
While the large issues are public transport and traffic, one
of the negatives about Newman is his tunnels program. This means that his
support is substantially about his intentions and character and the idea that
he should be given a chance, rather than support for particular projects. His
supporters also tend to cite his undertaking to build “infrastructure” which
covers more than just tunnels. To his enemies “tunnels” focuses their dislike of
him and narrows his achievements down to what they see as being his weakest
point.
The Greens are not polling particularly well. While they are
20% of our sample, this is around historical averages, and will probably
translate into a real vote of between six and eight percent. The reasons for
this may well be that as a non-politician Newman is attractive to some of their
traditional supporters, and that none of the issues are the sort of iconic
environmental issues with which the Greens are normally associated. Newman also
acted early to take the heat out of the Greenhouse debate with the BCC actively
pursuing CO2 mitigation strategies.
Newman’s slogan of “Can do more” implicitly accepts some of
his failings, reinforcing that he’s not just another I’m-always-right
politician as well as drawing attention to one of the arguments that is
converting more voters than any other – I’m being frustrated by a
self-interested Labor party.
Most important Issues
|
Public Transport
|
22.8%
|
|
Infrastructure
|
6.7%
|
|
Council
|
6.7%
|
|
Traffic
|
6.1%
|
|
Planning
|
5.5%
|
|
Roads
|
5.5%
|
|
Services
|
5.5%
|
|
Environment
|
4.9%
|
|
People
|
4.3%
|
|
Future
|
4.3%
|
|
Brisbane
|
3.7%
|
|
Change
|
3%
|
|
Time
|
2.4%
|
|
Development
|
1.8%
|
Points from polling
- Demographics
only 35% female, over-represented in the older groups
- Traditional
voting intention is similar to our other qualitative surveys – Greens 19%
(about two to three times over-represented), Labor 36% (probably a little
under-represented), Liberal 22% (about one-third under-represented).
- Newman
scores 48% of the vote, and Rowell 35%. Past experience suggests that
after preferences this is likely to be 60% or better to Newman.
- Newman
collects 68% of those who don’t normally vote for any particular party,
and 17% of traditional Labor voters. He needs to because at 48% his vote
is more than twice the traditional Liberal vote – he is converting huge
numbers of voters to brand Newman.
- 39%
of voters agree or strongly agree that the city is heading in the right
direction and 39% disagree or strongly disagree – a dead heat – but this
isn’t hurting Newman. One reason is the hung city council.
- The hung
council is working strongly in Newman’s favour. 17% of voters mention it
spontaneously when asked whether the council is “heading in the right
direction”, and 26% of those voting for Newman mention it as one factor. It
is particularly effective with those who do not normally vote for any
particular party with 21% of them mentioning it, and of this percentage,
87.5% are voting for Newman.
- Virtually
all issues are to do with transport – roads and public transport (table
with ranked concepts below). Of these issues, infrastructure, roads and
traffic closely align with an intention to vote for Newman. Planning is a
concern close to intention to vote for Rowell, while public transport is
associated most with an intention to vote for Bragg. (Speculation. There
may be a split along car ownership and usage lines).
- “Future”
ranked well-down – voters are concerned about present problems.
- In
terms of reasons for voting for the various candidates, an intention to
vote for Newman is associated with concepts like “job” and Labor. Newman
is also associated with “Brisbane”.
The clear implication here is that he is seen as getting on with the job
and what’s best for Brisbane,
and the ALP is seen as having frustrated him and being interested in
what’s best for them. Interestingly the tunnels, and the term “Campbell
Newman” are most closely associated with voting for Rowell. There is a
personal element to this contest, and if Newman has a weakness, it is
being seen to be fixated on tunnels (something which many see as of
dubious benefit). Interestingly, those who refer to Newman by his surname
alone are more likely to be supporters than those who call him “Campbell
Newman”. Bragg is most clearly associated with the word “candidate”
indicating that she is seen in more personal, and personable terms.
- “Liberal”
does not feature as a concept. It is mentioned in the verbatims
occasionally, generally in negative terms. The brand is very much Newman.
“Can Do” is only mentioned 9 times in all the answers, indicating that it
has not really taken-off as a brand. However, the fact that “job” is so
strongly there indicates that “Can Do” is subliminally there.
|